AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Nam D Pham

Examiner Nam D Pham appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 83.1%, they average 1.37 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.37
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2012-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7203
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2480 - Recording and Compression

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
556
Granted Applications
462
Non-Granted Applications
94
Avg OA / Grant
1.37
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2487
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 83.1% 1.37
Art Unit 17 70.2% 2.12
Group 169 62.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 5 3 60.0%
2013 43 32 74.4%
2014 34 25 73.5%
2015 9 7 77.8%
2016 45 40 88.9%
2017 33 29 87.9%
2018 16 14 87.5%
2019 53 46 86.8%
2020 62 61 98.4%
2021 39 39 100.0%
2022 42 42 100.0%
2023 60 60 100.0%
2024 42 39 92.9%
2025 54 25 46.3%
2026 19 0 0.0%

462 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 552 4.7% 1.6% 35.7% 4.2%
2 161 1.2% 1.9% 67.7% 8.7%
3 35 2.9% 2.9% 68.6% 8.6%
4 14 0.0% 0.0% 78.6% 0.0%
5 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
7.4%
2012
3.4%
2013
1.9%
2014
0.0%
2015
2.9%
2016
2.7%
2017
0.0%
2018
1.5%
2019
1.4%
2020
10.9%
2021
12.2%
2022
1.5%
2023
2.0%
2024
3.9%
2025
9.5%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.