Examiner Alison Slater

Grant ratio: 69.9% (44th percentile in Art Unit 2487 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.11. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.11
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91687
Primary art unit
2487
Work group
2480
Technology center
2400
Applications
355
Granted applications
248
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0375

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 68.7% 2.12
Group 173 59.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.20 806 office actions across 367 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 367 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 152 41.4%
2 OAs 111 30.2%
3 OAs 40 10.9%
4 OAs 35 9.5%
5+ OAs 29 7.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 25.0% 2014 2015: 51.7% 2015 2016: 72.9% 2016 2017: 67.4% 2017 2018: 68.9% 2018 2019: 77.3% 2019 2020: 65.9% 2020 2021: 89.7% 2021 2022: 83.7% 2022 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 54.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20144125.0%
2015291551.7%
2016483572.9%
2017432967.4%
2018453168.9%
2019443477.3%
2020442965.9%
2021292689.7%
2022433683.7%
202466100.0%
202511654.5%
2026900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 367 0.5% 14.7% 75.5% 5.4%
Action 2 215 0.5% 10.7% 85.6% 2.3%
Action 3 104 0.0% 8.7% 88.5% 1.9%
Action 4 64 0.0% 9.4% 87.5% 1.6%
Action 5 29 0.0% 10.3% 86.2% 3.4%
Action 6 18 0.0% 5.6% 94.4% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 33 office actions
All years 0.4% 3 of 806 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 13, 2020 15/147,300 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 14, 2018 13/715,418 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
May. 11, 2018 14/162,075 Affirmed §103
Dec. 7, 2017 13/900,158 Reversed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.