Examiner Nathnael Aynalem

Grant ratio: 69.6% (38th percentile in Art Unit 2488 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.86. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.86
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87857
Primary art unit
2488
Work group
2480
Technology center
2400
Applications
710
Granted applications
494
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1482
Supervisor
Sath Perungavoor
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7455

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 68.8% 1.75
Group 173 59.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.91 1,354 office actions across 710 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 707 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 349 49.2%
2 OAs 203 28.6%
3 OAs 73 10.3%
4 OAs 49 6.9%
5+ OAs 33 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 36.4% 2011 2012: 80.4% 2012 2013: 53.7% 2013 2014: 67.5% 2014 2015: 81.6% 2015 2016: 89.4% 2016 2017: 84.4% 2017 2018: 72.5% 2018 2019: 86.0% 2019 2020: 67.8% 2020 2021: 77.3% 2021 2022: 62.2% 2022 2023: 83.9% 2023 2024: 83.0% 2024 2025: 47.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111436.4%
2012463780.4%
2013412253.7%
2014402767.5%
2015383181.6%
2016665989.4%
2017453884.4%
2018402972.5%
2019433786.0%
2020594067.8%
2021443477.3%
2022452862.2%
2023564783.9%
2024473983.0%
2025462247.8%
20264300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 707 1.8% 12.6% 70.0% 9.9%
Action 2 358 0.3% 10.6% 82.1% 5.6%
Action 3 155 0.0% 9.0% 83.9% 4.5%
Action 4 82 0.0% 8.5% 86.6% 3.7%
Action 5 33 0.0% 12.1% 81.8% 3.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 27.3% 72.7% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 60.0% 40.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.8% 2 of 261 office actions
All years 1.0% 14 of 1,354 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
8.9%
1.3%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.1%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 1, 2022 15/460,037 Affirmed §103
Aug. 4, 2017 14/476,585 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 16, 2015 12/450,694 Reversed N/A
Sep. 15, 2015 12/450,707 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.