Examiner Andrew Goldberg

Grant ratio: 61.2% (35th percentile in Art Unit 2491 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2016
Grant ratio 61.2%
Average office actions / grant 3.89
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86061
Primary art unit
2491
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
183
Granted applications
112

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 61.2% 2.40
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.82 699 office actions across 183 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 183 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 23 12.6%
2 OAs 36 19.7%
3 OAs 38 20.8%
4 OAs 30 16.4%
5+ OAs 56 30.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 51.4% 2010 2011: 63.6% 2011 2012: 58.1% 2012 2013: 81.8% 2013 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 41.7% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200918950.0%
2010371951.4%
2011221463.6%
2012311858.1%
2013332781.8%
2014271866.7%
201512541.7%
20163266.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 183 0.0% 10.4% 86.3% 2.2%
Action 2 160 0.0% 4.4% 91.9% 1.9%
Action 3 124 0.0% 0.8% 93.5% 1.6%
Action 4 86 0.0% 4.7% 91.9% 0.0%
Action 5 56 1.8% 0.0% 91.1% 3.6%
Action 6 38 2.6% 0.0% 97.4% 0.0%
Action 7 24 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 4.2%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 699 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 20. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 9 reversed.

Full reversal rate
45.0% 9/20 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 12/20 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 27, 2017 11/549,149 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 28, 2015 13/104,454 Reversed §101 · §103 · §112
Oct. 19, 2015 11/958,609 Reversed N/A
Aug. 11, 2015 12/032,446 Reversed N/A
Feb. 26, 2015 11/334,342 Reversed N/A
Jan. 26, 2015 10/934,873 Reversed §103
Oct. 27, 2014 11/747,678 Reversed §103
Sep. 19, 2014 12/145,285 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 5, 2014 11/935,758 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jun. 19, 2014 11/562,501 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 17, 2014 11/564,110 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 16, 2014 11/330,772 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.