Examiner Simon Kanaan

Grant ratio: 77.9% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2492 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.09. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: June 2026
Grant ratio 77.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.09
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85693
Primary art unit
2492
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
671
Granted applications
523
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3906
Supervisor
Catherine Thiaw
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1138

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 58.7% 2.15
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.08 1,395 office actions across 671 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 671 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 321 47.8%
2 OAs 167 24.9%
3 OAs 87 13.0%
4 OAs 51 7.6%
5+ OAs 45 6.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 33.3% 2008 2009: 54.5% 2009 2010: 52.0% 2010 2011: 77.8% 2011 2012: 76.0% 2012 2013: 84.8% 2013 2014: 75.7% 2014 2015: 88.2% 2015 2016: 60.9% 2016 2017: 82.6% 2017 2018: 83.8% 2018 2019: 87.8% 2019 2020: 91.8% 2020 2021: 92.5% 2021 2022: 97.7% 2022 2023: 89.6% 2023 2024: 83.8% 2024 2025: 44.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20083133.3%
2009221254.5%
2010251352.0%
2011453577.8%
2012251976.0%
2013332884.8%
2014372875.7%
2015171588.2%
2016231460.9%
2017463882.6%
2018746283.8%
2019494387.8%
2020494591.8%
2021403792.5%
2022444397.7%
2023484389.6%
2024373183.8%
2025361644.4%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 671 2.4% 31.6% 53.1% 3.1%
Action 2 350 0.6% 22.9% 72.6% 0.9%
Action 3 183 1.1% 14.2% 82.5% 1.1%
Action 4 96 0.0% 13.5% 85.4% 0.0%
Action 5 45 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 6 23 0.0% 13.0% 82.6% 4.3%
Action 7 12 8.3% 0.0% 91.7% 0.0%
Action 8 6 16.7% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 9 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.9% 4 of 140 office actions
All years 1.6% 23 of 1,395 office actions
Change +1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.6%
1.8%
0.9%
6.1%
2019: PEG
1.4%
1.4%
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
3.8%
2025: August memo
2.2%
5.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 6, 2020 13/865,362 Reversed N/A
Mar. 16, 2020 13/240,572 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jul. 30, 2019 14/667,256 Reversed §103
May. 25, 2018 14/366,283 Reversed §102
Jun. 30, 2014 10/555,569 Reversed N/A
May. 28, 2014 11/686,167 Affirmed §103
Dec. 12, 2013 11/301,108 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.