Examiner Louis Teng

Grant ratio: 81.2% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2492 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 81.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.25
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90429
Primary art unit
2492
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
165
Granted applications
134

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 58.7% 2.15
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.35 423 office actions across 180 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 180 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 70 38.9%
2 OAs 50 27.8%
3 OAs 26 14.4%
4 OAs 19 10.6%
5+ OAs 15 8.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 76.2% 2014 2015: 76.0% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 84.4% 2017 2018: 88.9% 2018 2019: 94.7% 2019 2020: 86.7% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
2013100.0%
2014211676.2%
2015251976.0%
2016241666.7%
2017322784.4%
2018272488.9%
2019191894.7%
2020151386.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 180 3.3% 7.2% 77.2% 9.4%
Action 2 110 2.7% 1.8% 87.3% 7.3%
Action 3 60 5.0% 1.7% 88.3% 5.0%
Action 4 34 2.9% 2.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 5 15 0.0% 0.0% 86.7% 13.3%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 3.1% 13 of 423 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
3.1%
4.6%
3.2%
1.4%
10.6%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 17, 2022 15/381,567 Reversed §103
Sep. 23, 2019 13/787,510 Reversed §103
Oct. 30, 2018 14/205,366 Reversed N/A
Feb. 17, 2017 14/091,842 Affirmed §103
Feb. 2, 2017 14/092,166 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Jun. 28, 2016 13/631,646 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.