Examiner Robert B Leung

Grant ratio: 77.6% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 2494 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.93. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.93
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87782
Primary art unit
2494
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
643
Granted applications
499
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1453
Supervisor
Jung Kim
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3804

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 64.6% 2.04
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.93 1,241 office actions across 643 applications
Applications with office actions 97.8% 629 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 14 2.2%
1 OA 314 48.8%
2 OAs 157 24.4%
3 OAs 68 10.6%
4 OAs 59 9.2%
5+ OAs 31 4.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 60.0% 2011 2012: 70.8% 2012 2013: 60.0% 2013 2014: 65.0% 2014 2015: 81.4% 2015 2016: 82.7% 2016 2017: 93.9% 2017 2018: 79.5% 2018 2019: 79.5% 2019 2020: 87.2% 2020 2021: 95.7% 2021 2022: 93.8% 2022 2023: 94.7% 2023 2024: 93.6% 2024 2025: 66.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011201260.0%
2012241770.8%
2013352160.0%
2014402665.0%
2015433581.4%
2016524382.7%
2017494693.9%
2018443579.5%
2019443579.5%
2020393487.2%
2021464495.7%
2022484593.8%
2023383694.7%
2024474493.6%
2025392666.7%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 629 5.9% 6.4% 64.9% 14.5%
Action 2 315 3.2% 4.1% 76.2% 12.4%
Action 3 158 3.8% 1.3% 84.2% 9.5%
Action 4 90 1.1% 1.1% 88.9% 6.7%
Action 5 31 0.0% 3.2% 93.5% 3.2%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 78.6% 14.3%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.9% 8 of 206 office actions
All years 4.4% 54 of 1,241 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.3%
8.5%
5.0%
7.5%
9.5%
2019: PEG
2.9%
5.3%
3.9%
6.6%
5.2%
2024: AI examples
2.7%
2025: August memo
3.4%
7.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 8, 2025 16/791,442 Affirmed §101
Jun. 18, 2025 17/169,434 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 26, 2017 13/621,491 Affirmed §103
Feb. 26, 2015 12/217,302 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.