Examiner Malcolm Cribbs

Grant ratio: 84.9% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2497 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 84.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.51
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81638
Primary art unit
2497
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
788
Granted applications
669
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1566
Supervisor
Eleni Shiferaw
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3867

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 66.5% 1.93
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.47 1,161 office actions across 788 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 784 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.5%
1 OA 548 69.5%
2 OAs 144 18.3%
3 OAs 60 7.6%
4 OAs 20 2.5%
5+ OAs 12 1.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 100.0% 2008 2010: 44.4% 2010 2011: 92.5% 2011 2012: 80.9% 2012 2013: 91.3% 2013 2014: 87.5% 2014 2015: 88.4% 2015 2016: 87.5% 2016 2017: 91.8% 2017 2018: 90.0% 2018 2019: 88.6% 2019 2020: 96.3% 2020 2021: 95.9% 2021 2022: 88.5% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 95.7% 2024 2025: 53.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200811100.0%
20109444.4%
2011403792.5%
2012473880.9%
2013696391.3%
2014484287.5%
2015433888.4%
2016484287.5%
2017494591.8%
2018403690.0%
2019706288.6%
2020545296.3%
2021494795.9%
2022524688.5%
2023564987.5%
2024464495.7%
2025432353.5%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 784 7.1% 2.6% 64.3% 21.0%
Action 2 236 4.7% 1.7% 82.2% 9.3%
Action 3 92 2.2% 2.2% 88.0% 7.6%
Action 4 32 6.3% 3.1% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 5 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 7.6% 11 of 144 office actions
All years 6.1% 71 of 1,161 office actions
Change +1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.7%
9.2%
2014: Alice
12.5%
7.5%
8.6%
9.2%
13.2%
2019: PEG
6.0%
1.4%
1.8%
6.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
14.0%
2025: August memo
2.2%
12.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 18, 2017 14/305,280 Affirmed §103
Sep. 18, 2015 10/471,323 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.