Examiner Angela Holmes

Grant ratio: 84.9% (88th percentile in Art Unit 2497 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.21. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2022
Grant ratio 84.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.21
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86649
Primary art unit
2497
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
385
Granted applications
327

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 66.5% 1.93
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.16 848 office actions across 392 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 392 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 135 34.4%
2 OAs 153 39.0%
3 OAs 47 12.0%
4 OAs 32 8.2%
5+ OAs 25 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 72.4% 2010 2011: 86.5% 2011 2012: 61.8% 2012 2013: 83.9% 2013 2014: 91.2% 2014 2015: 93.8% 2015 2016: 88.6% 2016 2017: 85.0% 2017 2018: 94.9% 2018 2019: 78.6% 2019 2020: 96.4% 2020 2021: 86.4% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20095360.0%
2010292172.4%
2011373286.5%
2012342161.8%
2013312683.9%
2014343191.2%
2015323093.8%
2016443988.6%
2017201785.0%
2018393794.9%
2019282278.6%
2020282796.4%
2021221986.4%
202222100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 392 1.5% 4.3% 90.8% 1.5%
Action 2 257 0.0% 0.8% 97.7% 0.4%
Action 3 104 0.0% 1.0% 96.2% 1.0%
Action 4 57 0.0% 0.0% 96.5% 0.0%
Action 5 25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.8% 7 of 848 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
0.0%
2.6%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 6/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2017 13/693,067 Affirmed §103
Sep. 2, 2016 13/660,651 Affirmed §103
Apr. 21, 2016 11/558,360 Reversed §112
Jan. 15, 2015 12/115,372 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 21, 2014 11/787,409 Affirmed in part N/A
May. 14, 2014 11/555,278 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §103
Mar. 27, 2014 11/787,498 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103
Mar. 26, 2014 10/981,064 Reversed §103 · §112
Feb. 5, 2014 11/549,728 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.