AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Afaq Ali

Examiner Afaq Ali appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 69.5%, they average 1.58 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.58
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2022-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1571
Predicted Supervisor
Ali Shayanfar
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1050
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2430 - Cryptography and Cybersecurity

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
151
Granted Applications
105
Non-Granted Applications
46
Avg OA / Grant
1.58
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2434
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 69.5% 1.58
Art Unit 32 67.7% 1.70
Group 225 65.1% 1.99
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2022; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2022 26 25 96.2%
2023 37 33 89.2%
2024 39 35 89.7%
2025 30 12 40.0%
2026 19 0 0.0%

105 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 139 0.7% 0.7% 92.1% 2.2%
2 59 3.4% 0.0% 89.8% 0.0%
3 27 0.0% 0.0% 92.6% 3.7%
4 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 0.0%
5 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2021
2.2%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.6%
2024
1.8%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.