AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sarah Lhymn

Examiner Sarah Lhymn appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 60.2%, they average 2.23 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.23
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
12 years (2015-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-0632
Predicted Supervisor
Xiao Wu
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7761
Tech Center
2600 - Communications
Group
2610 - Computer Graphic Processing and Hardware

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
576
Granted Applications
347
Non-Granted Applications
229
Avg OA / Grant
2.23
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2613
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 60.2% 2.23
Art Unit 30 49.5% 1.81
Group 290 50.2% 1.92
Tech Center 1,729 59.3% 1.88
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2015; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2015 37 19 51.4%
2016 42 18 42.9%
2017 52 30 57.7%
2018 47 36 76.6%
2019 55 42 76.4%
2020 66 50 75.8%
2021 56 43 76.8%
2022 48 33 68.8%
2023 48 32 66.7%
2024 47 25 53.2%
2025 55 19 34.5%
2026 23 0 0.0%

347 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 572 2.3% 1.7% 83.6% 4.7%
2 362 0.3% 0.8% 94.8% 2.8%
3 225 1.3% 0.4% 93.8% 3.1%
4 141 0.0% 0.0% 93.6% 5.0%
5 65 0.0% 0.0% 98.5% 1.5%
6 38 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 23 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 4.3%
8 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2014
3.1%
2015
0.7%
2016
0.6%
2017
0.8%
2018
2.0%
2019
2.3%
2020
1.8%
2021
0.7%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.4%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.