Examiner Xilin Guo

Grant ratio: 74.5% (78th percentile in Art Unit 2616 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.01. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.01
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90162
Primary art unit
2616
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
486
Granted applications
362
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5786
Supervisor
Daniel Hajnik
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7642

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 47.0% 1.98
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.01 978 office actions across 486 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 481 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.0%
1 OA 254 52.3%
2 OAs 110 22.6%
3 OAs 47 9.7%
4 OAs 33 6.8%
5+ OAs 37 7.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 48.3% 2014 2015: 61.5% 2015 2016: 72.0% 2016 2017: 80.6% 2017 2018: 84.2% 2018 2019: 81.8% 2019 2020: 91.5% 2020 2021: 97.4% 2021 2022: 92.9% 2022 2023: 89.6% 2023 2024: 95.6% 2024 2025: 52.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20131200.0%
2014291448.3%
2015261661.5%
2016251872.0%
2017362980.6%
2018383284.2%
2019332781.8%
2020474391.5%
2021383797.4%
2022423992.9%
2023484389.6%
2024454395.6%
2025402152.5%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 481 4.0% 2.1% 74.6% 15.0%
Action 2 227 0.0% 2.6% 93.8% 3.1%
Action 3 117 0.0% 0.0% 96.6% 3.4%
Action 4 70 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 1.4%
Action 5 37 0.0% 2.7% 97.3% 0.0%
Action 6 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 5.5% 9 of 163 office actions
All years 1.9% 19 of 978 office actions
Change +3.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
7.6%
2024: AI examples
5.2%
2025: August memo
11.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 9, 2025 17/191,605 Reversed §103
Aug. 17, 2022 14/964,322 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 29, 2016 13/362,289 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 27, 2016 13/311,420 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 25, 2016 13/401,054 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103
May. 24, 2016 13/402,026 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103
May. 20, 2016 13/400,944 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.