Examiner Richard Chan

Grant ratio: 59.8% (45th percentile in Art Unit 2618 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.72. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2016
Grant ratio 59.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.72
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81319
Primary art unit
2618
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
239
Granted applications
143

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 56.5% 1.87
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.63 628 office actions across 239 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 239 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 83 34.7%
2 OAs 62 25.9%
3 OAs 32 13.4%
4 OAs 26 10.9%
5+ OAs 36 15.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 45.5% 2008 2009: 48.3% 2009 2010: 64.1% 2010 2011: 69.2% 2011 2012: 53.8% 2012 2013: 73.0% 2013 2014: 60.7% 2014 2015: 61.1% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008331545.5%
2009291448.3%
2010392564.1%
2011261869.2%
2012261453.8%
2013372773.0%
2014281760.7%
2015181161.1%
20163266.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 239 0.0% 16.7% 66.5% 0.4%
Action 2 156 0.6% 14.7% 76.9% 0.0%
Action 3 94 0.0% 12.8% 79.8% 2.1%
Action 4 62 1.6% 9.7% 80.6% 1.6%
Action 5 36 0.0% 16.7% 77.8% 0.0%
Action 6 23 0.0% 13.0% 82.6% 4.3%
Action 7 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 628 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 31, 2015 11/849,365 Reversed N/A
Feb. 22, 2011 10/879,920 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.