Examiner Crystal A. Mathews

Grant ratio: 54.9% (18th percentile in Art Unit 2623 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.44. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2020
Grant ratio 54.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.44
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82229
Primary art unit
2623
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
293
Granted applications
161

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 14 64.4% 1.99
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.53 767 office actions across 303 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 303 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 111 36.6%
2 OAs 80 26.4%
3 OAs 40 13.2%
4 OAs 36 11.9%
5+ OAs 36 11.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 60.0% 2008 2009: 30.4% 2009 2010: 100.0% 2010 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 16.1% 2013 2014: 40.9% 2014 2015: 36.4% 2015 2016: 74.4% 2016 2017: 70.4% 2017 2018: 69.0% 2018 2019: 69.2% 2019 2020: 85.0% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008251560.0%
200923730.4%
201011100.0%
2012400.0%
201331516.1%
201422940.9%
2015331236.4%
2016392974.4%
2017271970.4%
2018292069.0%
2019392769.2%
2020201785.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 303 0.7% 10.2% 85.8% 1.0%
Action 2 192 0.0% 7.3% 91.7% 0.5%
Action 3 112 0.0% 1.8% 98.2% 0.0%
Action 4 72 0.0% 2.8% 97.2% 0.0%
Action 5 36 0.0% 2.8% 97.2% 0.0%
Action 6 25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 767 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
2.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 8, 2021 14/706,838 Reversed §103
Jan. 2, 2020 13/880,439 Reversed §103
Dec. 27, 2019 13/818,225 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 23, 2018 13/164,182 Reversed N/A
Aug. 26, 2016 13/029,333 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
May. 26, 2016 12/553,120 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 23, 2016 13/028,639 Affirmed §103
Apr. 20, 2016 12/932,635 Reversed N/A
Apr. 15, 2013 10/367,849 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.