Examiner Yuzhen Ge

Grant ratio: 54.0% (14th percentile in Art Unit 2624 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.05. Most common rejection type: §112.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 54.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.05
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81758
Primary art unit
2624
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
285
Granted applications
154
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7636
Supervisor
Andrew J. Fischer
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6779

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 60.5% 2.04
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 619 office actions across 285 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 284 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.4%
1 OA 141 49.5%
2 OAs 62 21.8%
3 OAs 28 9.8%
4 OAs 26 9.1%
5+ OAs 27 9.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.0% 2008 2009: 64.5% 2009 2010: 83.9% 2010 2011: 53.6% 2011 2012: 100.0% 2012 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 33.3% 2015 2016: 20.0% 2016 2017: 60.0% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 41.7% 2019 2020: 23.1% 2020 2021: 33.3% 2021 2022: 66.7% 2022 2023: 71.4% 2023 2024: 40.0% 2024 2025: 27.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008412561.0%
2009624064.5%
2010312683.9%
2011281553.6%
201222100.0%
201411100.0%
20156233.3%
201610220.0%
201710660.0%
20188675.0%
201912541.7%
202013323.1%
20219333.3%
202212866.7%
20237571.4%
20245240.0%
202511327.3%
20261700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 284 2.8% 7.4% 42.3% 44.7%
Action 2 143 1.4% 5.6% 55.2% 36.4%
Action 3 81 0.0% 4.9% 44.4% 46.9%
Action 4 53 0.0% 3.8% 43.4% 52.8%
Action 5 27 0.0% 0.0% 29.6% 70.4%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 37.5% 62.5%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 60 office actions
All years 1.6% 10 of 619 office actions
Change -1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.0%
3.9%
3.5%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
1.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 29, 2025 17/855,713 Affirmed §112
Feb. 14, 2022 15/945,333 Affirmed §103
Oct. 14, 2021 14/945,587 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.