Examiner Ifedayo Iluyomade

Grant ratio: 66.8% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2624 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.16. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.16
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85522
Primary art unit
2624
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
674
Granted applications
450
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7118
Supervisor
Matthew Eason
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7230

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 60.5% 2.04
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 1,465 office actions across 674 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 667 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.0%
1 OA 300 44.5%
2 OAs 173 25.7%
3 OAs 81 12.0%
4 OAs 50 7.4%
5+ OAs 63 9.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 42.1% 2009 2010: 54.1% 2010 2011: 63.3% 2011 2012: 60.0% 2012 2013: 65.9% 2013 2014: 84.6% 2014 2015: 76.9% 2015 2016: 65.6% 2016 2017: 76.6% 2017 2018: 82.5% 2018 2019: 65.7% 2019 2020: 84.1% 2020 2021: 86.8% 2021 2022: 90.0% 2022 2023: 81.3% 2023 2024: 74.1% 2024 2025: 52.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008400.0%
2009381642.1%
2010372054.1%
2011301963.3%
2012402460.0%
2013412765.9%
2014262284.6%
2015393076.9%
2016322165.6%
2017473676.6%
2018403382.5%
2019352365.7%
2020443784.1%
2021383386.8%
2022302790.0%
2023483981.3%
2024272074.1%
2025442352.3%
20263400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 667 0.0% 17.1% 73.6% 0.4%
Action 2 367 0.0% 11.4% 84.7% 1.1%
Action 3 194 0.0% 4.6% 94.8% 0.0%
Action 4 113 0.0% 4.4% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 5 63 0.0% 6.3% 92.1% 0.0%
Action 6 31 0.0% 6.5% 93.5% 0.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 194 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,465 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 27, 2024 17/404,833 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Apr. 2, 2021 15/349,153 Reversed §103
Dec. 13, 2016 12/633,381 Affirmed §103
Aug. 30, 2016 12/639,877 Reversed §103
Aug. 15, 2016 12/371,364 Reversed §103
Feb. 2, 2016 12/930,700 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.