Examiner Nicholas Lee

Grant ratio: 76.5% (89th percentile in Art Unit 2624 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.79. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.79
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85884
Primary art unit
2624
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
988
Granted applications
756
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7354
Supervisor
Matthew Eason
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7230

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 60.5% 2.04
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,793 office actions across 988 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 986 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 578 58.5%
2 OAs 227 23.0%
3 OAs 83 8.4%
4 OAs 46 4.7%
5+ OAs 52 5.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 37.0% 2009 2010: 53.1% 2010 2011: 59.1% 2011 2012: 71.4% 2012 2013: 79.7% 2013 2014: 89.8% 2014 2015: 91.4% 2015 2016: 89.3% 2016 2017: 91.8% 2017 2018: 87.1% 2018 2019: 81.3% 2019 2020: 93.3% 2020 2021: 94.2% 2021 2022: 95.2% 2022 2023: 93.2% 2023 2024: 96.5% 2024 2025: 44.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008500.0%
2009461737.0%
2010643453.1%
2011442659.1%
2012564071.4%
2013594779.7%
2014595389.8%
2015585391.4%
2016565089.3%
2017494591.8%
2018706187.1%
2019645281.3%
2020605693.3%
2021524994.2%
2022424095.2%
2023595593.2%
2024575596.5%
2025522344.2%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 986 1.8% 2.6% 74.5% 2.3%
Action 2 408 0.5% 3.7% 87.5% 2.0%
Action 3 181 0.6% 2.8% 93.4% 1.1%
Action 4 98 0.0% 2.0% 94.9% 1.0%
Action 5 52 0.0% 1.9% 92.3% 1.9%
Action 6 31 0.0% 3.2% 90.3% 6.5%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 3 of 218 office actions
All years 1.2% 21 of 1,793 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.9%
4.2%
1.4%
3.7%
2019: PEG
1.8%
1.0%
2.4%
0.0%
1.2%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 13, 2024 12/589,487 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 22, 2023 15/568,624 Affirmed §103
Jan. 7, 2022 15/980,338 Reversed §103
Sep. 15, 2016 13/403,175 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Mar. 4, 2015 12/398,519 Affirmed N/A
May. 30, 2013 11/237,578 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.