Examiner Henok Heyi

Grant ratio: 64.4% (48th percentile in Art Unit 2627 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.10. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2016
Grant ratio 64.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.10
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83561
Primary art unit
2627
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
371
Granted applications
239

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 60.2% 1.74
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.08 771 office actions across 371 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 371 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 161 43.4%
2 OAs 113 30.5%
3 OAs 44 11.9%
4 OAs 31 8.4%
5+ OAs 22 5.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 14.3% 2008 2009: 63.3% 2009 2010: 67.5% 2010 2011: 78.9% 2011 2012: 84.1% 2012 2013: 51.2% 2013 2014: 62.9% 2014 2015: 78.4% 2015 2016: 55.2% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200828414.3%
2009603863.3%
2010402767.5%
2011574578.9%
2012443784.1%
2013412151.2%
2014352262.9%
2015372978.4%
2016291655.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 371 0.3% 28.8% 64.2% 0.0%
Action 2 210 0.5% 22.9% 69.0% 1.0%
Action 3 97 0.0% 16.5% 77.3% 3.1%
Action 4 53 0.0% 17.0% 77.4% 1.9%
Action 5 22 0.0% 13.6% 77.3% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 18.2% 72.7% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 771 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
27.3% 3/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
63.6% 7/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 23, 2016 13/779,853 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 22, 2016 13/269,544 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Nov. 16, 2015 12/623,151 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 13, 2015 12/976,559 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 9, 2015 12/033,755 Affirmed N/A
May. 12, 2015 12/137,061 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 30, 2015 12/056,200 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 27, 2015 10/824,926 Reversed §103
Jan. 17, 2015 12/630,707 Reversed N/A
Oct. 31, 2013 11/831,490 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 29, 2012 11/068,858 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.