Examiner Aneeta Yodichkas

Grant ratio: 67.5% (61st percentile in Art Unit 2627 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.98. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.98
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84945
Primary art unit
2627
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
730
Granted applications
493
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9773
Supervisor
Ke Xiao
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7776

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 60.2% 1.74
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.99 1,468 office actions across 738 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 738 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 347 47.0%
2 OAs 218 29.5%
3 OAs 88 11.9%
4 OAs 40 5.4%
5+ OAs 45 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 13.0% 2008 2009: 39.1% 2009 2010: 54.5% 2010 2011: 66.1% 2011 2012: 63.6% 2012 2013: 66.1% 2013 2014: 89.5% 2014 2015: 74.1% 2015 2016: 73.7% 2016 2017: 60.6% 2017 2018: 87.8% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 90.5% 2020 2021: 91.9% 2021 2022: 87.2% 2022 2023: 84.6% 2023 2025: 21.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200823313.0%
2009692739.1%
2010442454.5%
2011563766.1%
2012442863.6%
2013593966.1%
2014383489.5%
2015272074.1%
2016191473.7%
2017332060.6%
2018494387.8%
2019484083.3%
2020635790.5%
2021625791.9%
2022393487.2%
2023131184.6%
202523521.7%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 738 0.7% 28.5% 63.1% 4.2%
Action 2 391 1.5% 18.2% 72.4% 3.6%
Action 3 173 2.3% 23.1% 69.4% 2.9%
Action 4 85 1.2% 16.5% 82.4% 0.0%
Action 5 45 0.0% 15.6% 80.0% 4.4%
Action 6 19 0.0% 10.5% 84.2% 5.3%
Action 7 8 12.5% 12.5% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 56 office actions
All years 1.2% 17 of 1,468 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
11.3%
3.1%
2019: PEG
1.4%
1.9%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 3, 2020 14/818,970 Reversed §103
Oct. 22, 2019 13/687,167 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 17, 2019 13/613,840 Affirmed §101 · §112
Nov. 20, 2018 13/627,885 Reversed §101 · §102 · §103
Nov. 3, 2015 12/570,106 Reversed N/A
Oct. 29, 2015 13/230,290 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 8, 2014 11/245,356 Affirmed §103
Sep. 25, 2014 10/558,059 Reversed N/A
Jun. 10, 2013 11/379,221 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.