Examiner Carl Adams

Grant ratio: 65.5% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2627 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.17. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.17
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85764
Primary art unit
2627
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
821
Granted applications
538
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7448
Supervisor
Ke Xiao
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7776

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 60.2% 1.74
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 1,781 office actions across 821 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 816 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.6%
1 OA 395 48.1%
2 OAs 201 24.5%
3 OAs 66 8.0%
4 OAs 75 9.1%
5+ OAs 79 9.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 29.0% 2009 2010: 40.6% 2010 2011: 34.9% 2011 2012: 48.6% 2012 2013: 37.5% 2013 2014: 45.7% 2014 2015: 26.1% 2015 2016: 53.5% 2016 2017: 85.4% 2017 2018: 86.8% 2018 2019: 86.4% 2019 2020: 85.7% 2020 2021: 94.4% 2021 2022: 90.2% 2022 2023: 92.3% 2023 2024: 89.8% 2024 2025: 42.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008700.0%
200931929.0%
2010321340.6%
2011431534.9%
2012351748.6%
2013321237.5%
2014351645.7%
201523626.1%
2016432353.5%
2017413585.4%
2018383386.8%
2019595186.4%
2020635485.7%
2021716794.4%
2022615590.2%
2023656092.3%
2024595389.8%
2025451942.2%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 816 0.5% 17.5% 78.4% 0.6%
Action 2 421 0.0% 9.3% 88.1% 1.4%
Action 3 220 0.0% 2.7% 97.7% 0.0%
Action 4 154 0.0% 1.3% 98.7% 0.0%
Action 5 79 1.3% 1.3% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 6 52 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 21 0.0% 4.8% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 215 office actions
All years 0.3% 5 of 1,781 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
3.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2024 16/904,760 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 31, 2023 15/417,608 Affirmed §103
Jul. 31, 2017 13/926,128 Affirmed §103
Mar. 22, 2017 13/415,105 Affirmed §103
Jul. 29, 2016 12/834,567 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 21, 2016 12/347,178 Reversed §103
Dec. 22, 2014 11/468,489 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.