Examiner Cindy Trandai

Grant ratio: 72.2% (45th percentile in Art Unit 2648 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.05. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.05
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87993
Primary art unit
2648
Work group
2640
Technology center
2600
Applications
544
Granted applications
393
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1914
Supervisor
Wesley L. Kim
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7867

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 61.1% 1.74
Group 226 57.7% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.06 1,127 office actions across 546 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 546 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 249 45.6%
2 OAs 160 29.3%
3 OAs 59 10.8%
4 OAs 44 8.1%
5+ OAs 34 6.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 71.4% 2011 2012: 51.6% 2012 2013: 61.5% 2013 2014: 73.7% 2014 2015: 72.9% 2015 2016: 78.7% 2016 2017: 81.0% 2017 2018: 90.2% 2018 2019: 77.3% 2019 2020: 88.2% 2020 2021: 80.0% 2021 2022: 79.4% 2022 2023: 88.9% 2023 2024: 82.4% 2024 2025: 56.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011141071.4%
2012311651.6%
2013392461.5%
2014382873.7%
2015483572.9%
2016473778.7%
2017423481.0%
2018514690.2%
2019443477.3%
2020343088.2%
2021302480.0%
2022342779.4%
2023181688.9%
2024171482.4%
2025321856.3%
20262500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 546 0.2% 2.0% 96.5% 0.4%
Action 2 297 0.0% 1.7% 96.3% 1.0%
Action 3 137 0.7% 0.7% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 4 78 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 34 0.0% 2.9% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 95 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,127 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 4/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 28, 2025 17/235,745 Affirmed §103
Oct. 13, 2021 15/714,970 Affirmed §103
Sep. 3, 2019 14/785,736 Affirmed §103
Jul. 27, 2018 14/782,800 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 31, 2018 14/781,628 Affirmed §103
Sep. 27, 2017 14/149,604 Reversed §103
May. 4, 2017 13/983,880 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 22, 2016 13/106,598 Reversed §103
Jun. 28, 2016 12/312,260 Affirmed §103
Apr. 20, 2015 12/743,343 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.