Examiner Oleg Asanbayev

Grant ratio: 61.5% (25th percentile in Art Unit 2652 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2018
Grant ratio 61.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.94
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86200
Primary art unit
2652
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
257
Granted applications
158

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 68.7% 2.03
Group 210 59.0% 1.87
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.71 747 office actions across 276 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 276 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 83 30.1%
2 OAs 78 28.3%
3 OAs 40 14.5%
4 OAs 37 13.4%
5+ OAs 38 13.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 26.3% 2009 2010: 40.6% 2010 2011: 65.0% 2011 2012: 60.0% 2012 2013: 83.3% 2013 2014: 76.0% 2014 2015: 64.7% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 56.3% 2017 2018: 72.7% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200919526.3%
2010321340.6%
2011402665.0%
2012402460.0%
2013302583.3%
2014251976.0%
2015171164.7%
2016271866.7%
201716956.3%
201811872.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 276 0.4% 4.7% 93.1% 0.7%
Action 2 193 0.5% 3.1% 89.1% 1.6%
Action 3 115 0.0% 3.5% 93.0% 0.0%
Action 4 75 0.0% 0.0% 94.7% 1.3%
Action 5 38 0.0% 0.0% 97.4% 2.6%
Action 6 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 0.0%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 747 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 23, 2018 14/461,385 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 6, 2017 14/853,704 Affirmed §101 · §103
Apr. 12, 2016 11/389,503 Affirmed in part N/A
Nov. 23, 2015 11/776,020 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 16, 2015 12/140,610 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.