Examiner Douglas Suthers

Grant ratio: 70.6% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 2654 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 70.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81295
Primary art unit
2654
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
829
Granted applications
585
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0563
Supervisor
Vivian Chin
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7848

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 49.3% 1.87
Group 210 59.0% 1.87
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.92 1,595 office actions across 830 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 830 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 425 51.2%
2 OAs 219 26.4%
3 OAs 85 10.2%
4 OAs 60 7.2%
5+ OAs 41 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 33.3% 2008 2009: 55.6% 2009 2010: 61.0% 2010 2011: 74.5% 2011 2012: 80.5% 2012 2013: 76.3% 2013 2014: 69.8% 2014 2015: 80.0% 2015 2016: 67.7% 2016 2017: 63.0% 2017 2018: 82.9% 2018 2019: 90.2% 2019 2020: 92.2% 2020 2021: 84.8% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 90.5% 2023 2024: 92.9% 2024 2025: 55.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008331133.3%
2009633555.6%
2010412561.0%
2011473574.5%
2012413380.5%
2013382976.3%
2014433069.8%
2015403280.0%
2016312167.7%
2017462963.0%
2018413482.9%
2019514690.2%
2020514792.2%
2021332884.8%
2022484287.5%
2023423890.5%
2024423992.9%
2025563155.4%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 830 3.7% 8.4% 53.3% 24.0%
Action 2 405 3.7% 6.2% 59.0% 25.9%
Action 3 186 3.2% 4.3% 64.0% 22.6%
Action 4 101 3.0% 3.0% 68.3% 22.8%
Action 5 41 2.4% 2.4% 63.4% 24.4%
Action 6 17 5.9% 5.9% 64.7% 23.5%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 3 of 210 office actions
All years 3.6% 57 of 1,595 office actions
Change -2.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.0%
2.9%
2.0%
3.2%
4.5%
4.8%
2014: Alice
4.8%
2.7%
3.9%
8.8%
9.4%
2019: PEG
4.8%
1.2%
0.0%
1.4%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
1.4%
2.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 8, 2013 10/476,169 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 29, 2012 11/058,800 Affirmed §103
Feb. 27, 2012 10/918,409 Affirmed §103
Feb. 14, 2012 12/481,555 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 6, 2012 10/638,641 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.