Examiner Joseph Saunders

Grant ratio: 65.1% (39th percentile in Art Unit 2655 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 65.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.73
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82158
Primary art unit
2655
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
799
Granted applications
520
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1063
Supervisor
Carolyn R Edwards
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7136

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 60.3% 1.80
Group 210 59.0% 1.87
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.74 1,394 office actions across 799 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 798 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 436 54.6%
2 OAs 231 28.9%
3 OAs 68 8.5%
4 OAs 42 5.3%
5+ OAs 21 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 18.8% 2008 2009: 53.3% 2009 2010: 35.5% 2010 2011: 34.6% 2011 2012: 59.2% 2012 2013: 65.0% 2013 2014: 61.1% 2014 2015: 75.0% 2015 2016: 80.5% 2016 2017: 77.3% 2017 2018: 78.4% 2018 2019: 85.0% 2019 2020: 92.5% 2020 2021: 87.0% 2021 2022: 94.9% 2022 2023: 88.6% 2023 2024: 94.1% 2024 2025: 41.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200832618.8%
2009301653.3%
2010311135.5%
201126934.6%
2012492959.2%
2013402665.0%
2014543361.1%
2015362775.0%
2016413380.5%
2017443477.3%
2018514078.4%
2019403485.0%
2020403792.5%
2021464087.0%
2022393794.9%
2023443988.6%
2024514894.1%
2025512141.2%
20265400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 798 0.9% 19.7% 67.7% 5.5%
Action 2 362 0.6% 13.3% 74.0% 7.5%
Action 3 131 3.1% 8.4% 77.1% 6.9%
Action 4 63 0.0% 4.8% 87.3% 4.8%
Action 5 21 4.8% 4.8% 85.7% 4.8%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 22.2%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 4 of 227 office actions
All years 1.0% 14 of 1,394 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
3.4%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.5%
1.4%
1.7%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
4.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 24, 2020 15/257,642 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jul. 25, 2016 11/903,639 Affirmed §103
Mar. 2, 2016 11/608,367 Affirmed §103
Feb. 18, 2015 11/859,773 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 8, 2013 10/862,954 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 31, 2012 11/327,936 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.