Examiner Kuassi Ganmavo

Grant ratio: 61.2% (24th percentile in Art Unit 2655 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 61.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87992
Primary art unit
2655
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
658
Granted applications
403
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5761
Supervisor
Carolyn Edwards
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7136

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 60.3% 1.80
Group 210 59.0% 1.87
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.27 1,495 office actions across 658 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 658 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 236 35.9%
2 OAs 219 33.3%
3 OAs 89 13.5%
4 OAs 58 8.8%
5+ OAs 56 8.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 47.1% 2011 2012: 64.6% 2012 2013: 62.5% 2013 2014: 52.6% 2014 2015: 53.8% 2015 2016: 55.0% 2016 2017: 55.9% 2017 2018: 78.8% 2018 2019: 76.9% 2019 2020: 71.7% 2020 2021: 88.9% 2021 2022: 91.2% 2022 2023: 84.1% 2023 2024: 72.2% 2024 2025: 38.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201117847.1%
2012483164.6%
2013402562.5%
2014382052.6%
2015392153.8%
2016402255.0%
2017341955.9%
2018524178.8%
2019524076.9%
2020463371.7%
2021363288.9%
2022343191.2%
2023443784.1%
2024362672.2%
2025441738.6%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 658 0.0% 2.4% 96.8% 0.0%
Action 2 422 0.0% 1.4% 95.5% 1.2%
Action 3 203 0.0% 3.4% 94.6% 1.5%
Action 4 114 0.9% 2.6% 90.4% 4.4%
Action 5 56 0.0% 1.8% 96.4% 1.8%
Action 6 26 0.0% 3.8% 92.3% 3.8%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 273 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,495 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 31, 2022 15/804,718 Affirmed §102
Jan. 26, 2022 15/989,637 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 6, 2021 15/362,147 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 16, 2017 11/832,445 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 20, 2017 11/842,305 Affirmed §103
Jan. 27, 2016 12/727,595 Affirmed in part N/A
Dec. 11, 2015 12/509,031 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.