Examiner James K Mooney

Grant ratio: 68.6% (45th percentile in Art Unit 2655 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 68.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.70
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88772
Primary art unit
2655
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
739
Granted applications
507
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2412
Supervisor
Vivian Chin
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7848

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 60.3% 1.80
Group 210 59.0% 1.87
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.74 1,285 office actions across 739 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 739 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 426 57.6%
2 OAs 183 24.8%
3 OAs 68 9.2%
4 OAs 43 5.8%
5+ OAs 19 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 61.5% 2014 2015: 55.3% 2015 2016: 61.7% 2016 2017: 69.8% 2017 2018: 78.2% 2018 2019: 83.6% 2019 2020: 91.7% 2020 2021: 87.0% 2021 2022: 78.7% 2022 2023: 88.9% 2023 2024: 82.1% 2024 2025: 44.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20123133.3%
2013321650.0%
2014523261.5%
2015472655.3%
2016472961.7%
2017533769.8%
2018554378.2%
2019554683.6%
2020605591.7%
2021544787.0%
2022614878.7%
2023544888.9%
2024564682.1%
2025743344.6%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 739 0.8% 2.0% 81.7% 11.6%
Action 2 313 0.6% 2.2% 88.8% 6.7%
Action 3 130 0.8% 0.0% 88.5% 10.8%
Action 4 62 0.0% 0.0% 93.5% 6.5%
Action 5 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 18.2%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 3 of 248 office actions
All years 0.7% 9 of 1,285 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
1.9%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
3.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 15, 2024 17/569,006 Affirmed §103
Apr. 30, 2018 14/545,351 Affirmed §103
Dec. 29, 2017 14/558,127 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.