Examiner Bryan S Blankenagel

Grant ratio: 57.9% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2658 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.60. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 57.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.60
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92080
Primary art unit
2658
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
420
Granted applications
243
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0685
Supervisor
Richemond Dorvil
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7602

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 60.2% 1.95
Group 210 59.0% 1.87
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.71 1,139 office actions across 420 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 419 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 139 33.1%
2 OAs 98 23.3%
3 OAs 54 12.9%
4 OAs 71 16.9%
5+ OAs 57 13.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 15.4% 2015 2016: 31.8% 2016 2017: 60.0% 2017 2018: 81.3% 2018 2019: 63.2% 2019 2020: 59.5% 2020 2021: 86.7% 2021 2022: 70.0% 2022 2023: 68.3% 2023 2024: 69.8% 2024 2025: 44.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201513215.4%
201622731.8%
2017352160.0%
2018322681.3%
2019382463.2%
2020372259.5%
2021453986.7%
2022402870.0%
2023412868.3%
2024433069.8%
2025361644.4%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 419 15.3% 3.6% 77.8% 3.1%
Action 2 280 8.6% 0.4% 88.9% 1.4%
Action 3 182 6.0% 0.5% 90.7% 2.2%
Action 4 128 5.5% 0.8% 92.2% 1.6%
Action 5 57 3.5% 1.8% 93.0% 1.8%
Action 6 40 7.5% 0.0% 92.5% 0.0%
Action 7 17 11.8% 0.0% 88.2% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 20.2% 49 of 242 office actions
All years 9.9% 113 of 1,139 office actions
Change +10.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
15.5%
2019: PEG
1.9%
3.5%
13.5%
15.6%
4.9%
2024: AI examples
11.7%
2025: August memo
27.5%
38.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 17, 2026 17/521,232 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Apr. 24, 2024 17/331,995 Affirmed in part §101
Feb. 27, 2024 17/053,681 Reversed §101 · §112
Oct. 13, 2022 16/186,955 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 18, 2022 15/639,826 Affirmed §103
Apr. 10, 2019 15/152,906 Reversed §101
Apr. 3, 2018 14/002,509 Reversed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.