Examiner Qi Han

Grant ratio: 82.6% (98th percentile in Art Unit 2659 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.77. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2025
Grant ratio 82.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.77
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79457
Primary art unit
2659
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
688
Granted applications
568

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 58.8% 1.91
Group 210 59.4% 1.87
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.79 1,230 office actions across 688 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 686 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 386 56.1%
2 OAs 179 26.0%
3 OAs 58 8.4%
4 OAs 34 4.9%
5+ OAs 29 4.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 80.0% 2008 2009: 67.4% 2009 2010: 64.0% 2010 2011: 74.0% 2011 2012: 82.0% 2012 2013: 84.6% 2013 2014: 80.4% 2014 2015: 80.6% 2015 2016: 82.5% 2016 2017: 79.5% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 78.9% 2019 2020: 97.1% 2020 2021: 92.7% 2021 2022: 89.7% 2022 2023: 94.4% 2023 2024: 91.9% 2024 2025: 87.5% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008252080.0%
2009432967.4%
2010251664.0%
2011503774.0%
2012504182.0%
2013524484.6%
2014564580.4%
2015362980.6%
2016403382.5%
2017393179.5%
2018484083.3%
2019383078.9%
2020353497.1%
2021413892.7%
2022292689.7%
2023363494.4%
2024373491.9%
20258787.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 686 22.7% 1.2% 41.4% 20.0%
Action 2 300 12.7% 0.7% 52.0% 26.0%
Action 3 121 14.0% 2.5% 50.4% 25.6%
Action 4 63 9.5% 0.0% 52.4% 30.2%
Action 5 29 10.3% 3.4% 62.1% 20.7%
Action 6 15 6.7% 6.7% 60.0% 26.7%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 33.3%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 11.4% 10 of 88 office actions
All years 18.0% 221 of 1,230 office actions
Change -6.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.3%
8.8%
8.5%
26.1%
22.5%
15.7%
2014: Alice
28.8%
28.8%
28.6%
23.7%
35.3%
2019: PEG
6.0%
6.3%
1.7%
9.6%
9.7%
2024: AI examples
12.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 9, 2024 17/364,589 Affirmed §101 · §103
May. 25, 2022 16/401,349 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Nov. 5, 2018 14/931,132 Affirmed §101
Feb. 8, 2018 13/411,180 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 6, 2016 10/404,330 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 18, 2015 12/109,670 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 11, 2013 10/341,332 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.