Examiner David Kovacek

Grant ratio: 57.1% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2659 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2017
Grant ratio 57.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.66
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83737
Primary art unit
2659
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
219
Granted applications
125

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 58.8% 1.91
Group 210 59.4% 1.87
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.68 586 office actions across 219 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 219 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 68 31.1%
2 OAs 59 26.9%
3 OAs 33 15.1%
4 OAs 30 13.7%
5+ OAs 29 13.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 55.6% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 42.9% 2010 2011: 46.4% 2011 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 51.9% 2013 2014: 48.0% 2014 2015: 78.6% 2015 2016: 73.3% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008181055.6%
2009261350.0%
201021942.9%
2011281346.4%
2012302066.7%
2013271451.9%
2014251248.0%
2015282278.6%
2016151173.3%
201711100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 219 0.9% 11.4% 74.9% 0.9%
Action 2 151 0.0% 5.3% 88.1% 0.7%
Action 3 92 0.0% 4.3% 90.2% 1.1%
Action 4 59 0.0% 8.5% 91.5% 0.0%
Action 5 29 0.0% 3.4% 96.6% 0.0%
Action 6 18 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 586 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 2/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 19, 2016 13/763,783 Affirmed §103
Dec. 19, 2016 13/528,895 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 9, 2016 12/614,260 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 29, 2016 11/627,591 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 11, 2015 11/558,658 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 9, 2014 11/190,680 Reversed N/A
Nov. 18, 2014 11/616,973 Granted-In-Part §101 · §102
Oct. 27, 2014 11/213,139 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 26, 2014 11/211,931 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 28, 2014 11/646,911 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 7, 2011 10/897,056 Reversed §102 · §103 · §120

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.