Examiner Fariba Sirjani

Grant ratio: 68.8% (57th percentile in Art Unit 2659 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.36
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87883
Primary art unit
2659
Work group
2650
Technology center
2600
Applications
587
Granted applications
404
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1499
Supervisor
Pierre Desir
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7799

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 58.8% 1.91
Group 210 59.4% 1.87
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.22 1,306 office actions across 587 applications
Applications with office actions 97.3% 571 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 16 2.7%
1 OA 197 33.6%
2 OAs 188 32.0%
3 OAs 86 14.7%
4 OAs 58 9.9%
5+ OAs 42 7.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2011: 28.6% 2011 2012: 75.0% 2012 2013: 78.1% 2013 2014: 59.3% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 69.0% 2016 2017: 90.5% 2017 2018: 83.0% 2018 2019: 79.5% 2019 2020: 73.3% 2020 2021: 81.3% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 84.4% 2023 2024: 77.5% 2024 2025: 37.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911100.0%
201114428.6%
2012322475.0%
2013322578.1%
2014271659.3%
2015352160.0%
2016422969.0%
2017423890.5%
2018473983.0%
2019393179.5%
2020453373.3%
2021322681.3%
2022484287.5%
2023322784.4%
2024403177.5%
2025451737.8%
20263400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 571 1.6% 4.0% 89.5% 1.1%
Action 2 374 0.8% 3.2% 93.0% 0.8%
Action 3 186 0.5% 4.8% 89.8% 2.7%
Action 4 100 0.0% 2.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 5 42 2.4% 2.4% 92.9% 2.4%
Action 6 18 5.6% 0.0% 88.9% 5.6%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 223 office actions
All years 1.3% 17 of 1,306 office actions
Change -0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
3.4%
4.1%
2019: PEG
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
3.4%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 1, 2021 15/471,436 Affirmed §103
May. 19, 2020 14/479,902 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Apr. 26, 2017 12/470,492 Affirmed §103
Apr. 16, 2015 12/183,437 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 31, 2013 11/956,675 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.