Examiner Thang D Tran

Grant ratio: 67.4% (77th percentile in Art Unit 2683 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.78
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91560
Primary art unit
2683
Work group
2680
Technology center
2600
Applications
516
Granted applications
348
Examiner phone
(408) 918-7546
Supervisor
Brian A Zimmerman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3059

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 57.9% 1.97
Group 114 64.6% 1.80
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.86 960 office actions across 516 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 515 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 269 52.1%
2 OAs 140 27.1%
3 OAs 41 7.9%
4 OAs 47 9.1%
5+ OAs 18 3.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 40.9% 2016 2017: 69.6% 2017 2018: 82.2% 2018 2019: 71.7% 2019 2020: 78.9% 2020 2021: 86.7% 2021 2022: 80.5% 2022 2023: 85.5% 2023 2024: 76.8% 2024 2025: 32.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201622940.9%
2017463269.6%
2018453782.2%
2019463371.7%
2020766078.9%
2021453986.7%
2022413380.5%
2023554785.5%
2024564376.8%
2025461532.6%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 515 0.2% 1.6% 85.0% 1.2%
Action 2 246 0.8% 0.4% 95.5% 1.2%
Action 3 106 0.0% 0.9% 91.5% 2.8%
Action 4 65 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 276 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 960 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 11, 2026 17/869,466 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Feb. 2, 2022 16/395,916 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2021 15/276,832 Affirmed §103
Sep. 18, 2020 14/590,988 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 27, 2020 15/592,397 Reversed §103
Jan. 31, 2019 15/113,831 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 28, 2018 14/585,222 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.