AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Son M. Tang

Appears inactive Last observed office action: July 2025 (11 months ago).

Examiner Son M. Tang appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 57.6%, they average 2.14 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.14
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Tech Center
2600 - Communications
Group
2680 - Facsimile, Static Presentation, Telemetry, Code Generation, and Storage Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
514
Granted Applications
296
Non-Granted Applications
218
Avg OA / Grant
2.14
Last OA Observed
July 2025 (11 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2612 , 2681 , 2685 , 2688
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 57.6% 2.14
Art Unit 14 69.7% 1.89
Group 112 66.5% 1.80
Tech Center 1,729 59.3% 1.88
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 20 15 75.0%
2009 48 17 35.4%
2010 30 17 56.7%
2011 28 18 64.3%
2012 34 17 50.0%
2013 39 27 69.2%
2014 23 15 65.2%
2015 26 16 61.5%
2016 39 23 59.0%
2017 25 13 52.0%
2018 28 13 46.4%
2019 32 23 71.9%
2020 29 15 51.7%
2021 22 13 59.1%
2022 27 17 63.0%
2023 30 22 73.3%
2024 25 13 52.0%
2025 9 2 22.2%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

296 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 518 0.6% 1.9% 94.8% 1.2%
2 284 0.4% 0.7% 97.2% 0.4%
3 155 0.0% 1.3% 96.8% 1.9%
4 90 0.0% 1.1% 97.8% 0.0%
5 43 0.0% 2.3% 97.7% 0.0%
6 22 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
1.6%
2010
0.0%
2011
1.3%
2012
1.4%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
1.5%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.