Examiner Carlos E. Garcia

Grant ratio: 70.6% (45th percentile in Art Unit 2688 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.79. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.79
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82667
Primary art unit
2688
Work group
2680
Technology center
2600
Applications
949
Granted applications
670
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1354
Supervisor
Brian Zimmerman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3059

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 66.1% 1.68
Group 114 64.6% 1.80
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.88 1,780 office actions across 949 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 947 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 500 52.7%
2 OAs 240 25.3%
3 OAs 112 11.8%
4 OAs 46 4.8%
5+ OAs 49 5.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 40.7% 2008 2009: 45.5% 2009 2010: 48.8% 2010 2011: 65.0% 2011 2012: 48.0% 2012 2013: 65.8% 2013 2014: 97.6% 2014 2015: 84.5% 2015 2016: 73.8% 2016 2017: 93.8% 2017 2018: 83.0% 2018 2019: 91.2% 2019 2020: 87.8% 2020 2021: 92.5% 2021 2022: 87.0% 2022 2023: 89.4% 2023 2024: 76.1% 2024 2025: 49.1% 2025 2026: 1.8% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008271140.7%
2009552545.5%
2010412048.8%
2011402665.0%
2012251248.0%
2013734865.8%
2014414097.6%
2015584984.5%
2016614573.8%
2017484593.8%
2018534483.0%
2019686291.2%
2020494387.8%
2021534992.5%
2022544787.0%
2023474289.4%
2024463576.1%
2025532649.1%
20265711.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 947 1.0% 21.8% 72.8% 3.0%
Action 2 447 0.2% 13.4% 82.3% 3.6%
Action 3 207 0.0% 12.1% 85.0% 1.9%
Action 4 95 0.0% 8.4% 87.4% 4.2%
Action 5 49 0.0% 4.1% 91.8% 4.1%
Action 6 24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.9% 5 of 261 office actions
All years 0.6% 10 of 1,780 office actions
Change +1.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
1.1%
2019: PEG
1.1%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
7.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 17, 2020 15/139,420 Reversed §103
Mar. 26, 2018 14/578,675 Affirmed in part §102
May. 25, 2016 13/096,685 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 11, 2015 12/642,660 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 24, 2014 10/974,485 Affirmed §103
Jan. 14, 2014 11/258,968 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.