Examiner Chad Dicke

Grant ratio: 68.1% (39th percentile in Art Unit 2693 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.37. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: May 2026
Grant ratio 68.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.37
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88892
Primary art unit
2693
Work group
2690
Technology center
2600
Applications
533
Granted applications
363

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 64.8% 2.05
Group 96 51.2% 2.11
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.61 1,412 office actions across 541 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 541 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 176 32.5%
2 OAs 166 30.7%
3 OAs 63 11.6%
4 OAs 66 12.2%
5+ OAs 70 12.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 60.0% 2012 2013: 46.7% 2013 2014: 48.6% 2014 2015: 56.4% 2015 2016: 54.7% 2016 2017: 72.3% 2017 2018: 52.1% 2018 2019: 77.6% 2019 2020: 63.2% 2020 2021: 88.0% 2021 2022: 84.3% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20125360.0%
2013301446.7%
2014371848.6%
2015392256.4%
2016532954.7%
2017473472.3%
2018482552.1%
2019584577.6%
2020684363.2%
2021756688.0%
2022514384.3%
20232121100.0%
2026100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 541 0.4% 3.5% 88.9% 5.2%
Action 2 365 0.3% 2.5% 93.2% 3.6%
Action 3 199 0.0% 2.0% 97.0% 1.0%
Action 4 136 0.0% 0.7% 96.3% 2.9%
Action 5 70 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 1.4%
Action 6 44 0.0% 0.0% 97.7% 2.3%
Action 7 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 18 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 5.6%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 3 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,412 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.8%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 3, 2024 16/417,025 Reversed N/A
Oct. 3, 2022 15/117,692 Affirmed §103
Oct. 27, 2020 16/692,893 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jun. 30, 2020 14/016,264 Reversed §103
May. 30, 2018 14/353,372 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Mar. 28, 2018 14/128,442 Reversed §103
Feb. 28, 2017 13/102,658 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.