Examiner Sarah Salerno

Grant ratio: 66.4% (52nd percentile in Art Unit 2814 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.73
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82484
Primary art unit
2814
Work group
2810
Technology center
2800
Applications
902
Granted applications
599
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1266
Supervisor
Wael Fahmy
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1705

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 36 59.1% 1.77
Group 305 54.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.74 2,473 office actions across 902 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 893 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 1.0%
1 OA 237 26.3%
2 OAs 272 30.2%
3 OAs 148 16.4%
4 OAs 117 13.0%
5+ OAs 119 13.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 12.5% 2007 2008: 36.8% 2008 2009: 38.9% 2009 2010: 63.6% 2010 2011: 54.8% 2011 2012: 63.2% 2012 2013: 71.2% 2013 2014: 69.2% 2014 2015: 64.3% 2015 2016: 88.9% 2016 2017: 76.9% 2017 2018: 80.0% 2018 2019: 73.7% 2019 2020: 78.3% 2020 2021: 94.1% 2021 2022: 92.0% 2022 2023: 83.1% 2023 2024: 82.7% 2024 2025: 57.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20078112.5%
2008381436.8%
2009542138.9%
2010332163.6%
2011422354.8%
2012382463.2%
2013523771.2%
2014523669.2%
2015422764.3%
2016544888.9%
2017393076.9%
2018453680.0%
2019382873.7%
2020463678.3%
2021514894.1%
2022504692.0%
2023594983.1%
2024524382.7%
2025543157.4%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 893 0.0% 19.9% 78.3% 0.8%
Action 2 656 0.0% 10.7% 88.1% 0.5%
Action 3 384 0.0% 6.5% 91.4% 1.0%
Action 4 236 0.0% 4.7% 94.1% 0.8%
Action 5 119 0.0% 4.2% 95.0% 0.8%
Action 6 76 0.0% 1.3% 94.7% 2.6%
Action 7 40 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 25 0.0% 4.0% 96.0% 0.0%
Action 9 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 322 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 2,473 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 26, 2024 16/123,100 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 31, 2017 12/407,949 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 19, 2017 13/167,247 Reversed §103
Nov. 16, 2016 12/860,256 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 26, 2016 12/371,029 Reversed §103
Dec. 8, 2015 12/860,156 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.