Examiner Marc Armand

Grant ratio: 77.3% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2814 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.71. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.71
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82874
Primary art unit
2814
Work group
2810
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,110
Granted applications
858
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9751
Supervisor
Steven B Gauthier
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-0373

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 36 59.1% 1.77
Group 305 54.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.72 1,918 office actions across 1,112 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,112 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 666 59.9%
2 OAs 239 21.5%
3 OAs 118 10.6%
4 OAs 62 5.6%
5+ OAs 27 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 37.5% 2007 2008: 53.2% 2008 2009: 61.2% 2009 2010: 69.1% 2010 2011: 86.1% 2011 2012: 73.3% 2012 2013: 80.3% 2013 2014: 88.7% 2014 2015: 90.0% 2015 2016: 89.2% 2016 2017: 86.1% 2017 2018: 89.6% 2018 2019: 92.9% 2019 2020: 91.1% 2020 2021: 88.2% 2021 2022: 98.0% 2022 2023: 93.1% 2023 2024: 87.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200716637.5%
2008472553.2%
2009674161.2%
2010684769.1%
2011726286.1%
2012604473.3%
2013614980.3%
2014625588.7%
2015403690.0%
2016373389.2%
2017363186.1%
2018676089.6%
2019706592.9%
2020908291.1%
2021766788.2%
2022494898.0%
2023726793.1%
2024464087.0%
20252500.0%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,112 2.0% 7.1% 73.1% 3.0%
Action 2 446 0.7% 5.2% 89.5% 3.4%
Action 3 207 0.5% 3.9% 92.3% 1.0%
Action 4 89 0.0% 3.4% 94.4% 2.2%
Action 5 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 0.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 173 office actions
All years 1.4% 26 of 1,918 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.7%
2.6%
1.7%
2014: Alice
3.5%
2.0%
0.0%
2.6%
6.9%
2019: PEG
0.9%
1.7%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 24, 2025 16/802,819 Reversed §103
Sep. 19, 2014 11/119,379 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 25, 2014 11/351,438 Affirmed N/A
May. 30, 2014 11/734,479 Reversed N/A
Oct. 31, 2012 11/444,089 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.