Examiner Cuong B Nguyen

Grant ratio: 79.0% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2818 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 79.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87887
Primary art unit
2818
Work group
2810
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,003
Granted applications
792
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1509

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 48 48.7% 1.60
Group 305 54.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.70 1,706 office actions across 1,003 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 995 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 0.8%
1 OA 591 58.9%
2 OAs 230 22.9%
3 OAs 102 10.2%
4 OAs 39 3.9%
5+ OAs 33 3.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 60.7% 2011 2012: 71.2% 2012 2013: 62.3% 2013 2014: 81.2% 2014 2015: 87.9% 2015 2016: 83.9% 2016 2017: 95.6% 2017 2018: 81.2% 2018 2019: 87.5% 2019 2020: 91.5% 2020 2021: 96.3% 2021 2022: 98.7% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 97.1% 2024 2025: 62.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
2011281760.7%
2012523771.2%
2013533362.3%
2014695681.2%
2015585187.9%
2016564783.9%
2017454395.6%
2018695681.2%
2019726387.5%
2020716591.5%
2021817896.3%
2022787798.7%
20236464100.0%
2024706897.1%
2025583662.1%
20267800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 995 0.4% 16.9% 68.0% 11.8%
Action 2 404 1.0% 14.9% 78.5% 4.5%
Action 3 174 0.0% 12.6% 75.9% 11.5%
Action 4 72 0.0% 11.1% 77.8% 9.7%
Action 5 33 0.0% 12.1% 78.8% 9.1%
Action 6 15 0.0% 0.0% 73.3% 26.7%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 284 office actions
All years 0.5% 8 of 1,706 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
4.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 26, 2016 12/595,558 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 16, 2015 12/825,378 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 28, 2014 11/688,050 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.