Examiner Khamdan Alrobaie

Grant ratio: 78.2% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2824 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.61. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.61
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87310
Primary art unit
2824
Work group
2820
Technology center
2800
Applications
674
Granted applications
527
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7099
Supervisor
Richard Elms
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1869

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 76.9% 1.45
Group 207 71.2% 1.64
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.69 1,138 office actions across 674 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 672 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 402 59.6%
2 OAs 163 24.2%
3 OAs 52 7.7%
4 OAs 35 5.2%
5+ OAs 20 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 80.0% 2011 2012: 65.7% 2012 2013: 58.1% 2013 2014: 71.1% 2014 2015: 68.2% 2015 2016: 94.6% 2016 2017: 91.8% 2017 2018: 89.3% 2018 2019: 89.8% 2019 2020: 100.0% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 94.0% 2023 2024: 94.9% 2024 2025: 45.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011252080.0%
2012352365.7%
2013432558.1%
2014453271.1%
2015443068.2%
2016565394.6%
2017494591.8%
2018565089.3%
2019494489.8%
20203636100.0%
20213030100.0%
20223434100.0%
2023504794.0%
2024393794.9%
2025462145.7%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 672 2.2% 19.9% 53.4% 12.5%
Action 2 270 3.7% 12.2% 68.5% 10.4%
Action 3 107 8.4% 12.1% 72.0% 2.8%
Action 4 55 3.6% 14.5% 74.5% 7.3%
Action 5 20 5.0% 15.0% 75.0% 5.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 27.3% 63.6% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 190 office actions
All years 3.3% 37 of 1,138 office actions
Change -2.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
10.7%
18.9%
2019: PEG
2.8%
0.0%
4.3%
1.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 10, 2022 14/868,548 Reversed §103
Sep. 27, 2021 15/164,665 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 24, 2021 15/037,244 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 7, 2017 14/552,556 Affirmed §103
Oct. 22, 2015 12/555,831 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 14, 2014 12/502,211 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.