AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sultana Begum

Examiner Sultana Begum appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 84.7%, they average 1.54 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.54
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
12 years (2015-2026)
Phone
(571) 431-0691
Predicted Supervisor
Richard Elms
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1869
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2820 - Semiconductors A / Memory

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
549
Granted Applications
465
Non-Granted Applications
84
Avg OA / Grant
1.54
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2824
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 84.7% 1.54
Art Unit 28 78.0% 1.45
Group 205 73.0% 1.64
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2015; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2015 10 9 90.0%
2016 45 36 80.0%
2017 50 44 88.0%
2018 45 41 91.1%
2019 50 44 88.0%
2020 57 55 96.5%
2021 43 42 97.7%
2022 52 51 98.1%
2023 62 60 96.8%
2024 53 52 98.1%
2025 56 31 55.4%
2026 26 0 0.0%

465 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 549 0.4% 3.5% 82.0% 3.6%
2 220 0.5% 3.2% 84.5% 5.5%
3 68 1.5% 5.9% 83.8% 4.4%
4 23 4.3% 0.0% 78.3% 13.0%
5 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
1.2%
2018
1.1%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.4%
2021
0.0%
2022
2.2%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.