AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Thomas K Quigley

Examiner Thomas K Quigley appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 67.3%, they average 1.75 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.75
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
14 years (2013-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-4050
Predicted Supervisor
Tulsidas Patel
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2098
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2830 - Electrical Circuits and Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
493
Granted Applications
332
Non-Granted Applications
161
Avg OA / Grant
1.75
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2831 , 2832 , 2833 , 2834
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 67.3% 1.75
Art Unit 32 72.7% 1.44
Group 356 68.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2013; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2013 30 15 50.0%
2014 28 12 42.9%
2015 37 23 62.2%
2016 37 30 81.1%
2017 32 25 78.1%
2018 36 21 58.3%
2019 46 36 78.3%
2020 30 25 83.3%
2021 39 33 84.6%
2022 32 29 90.6%
2023 41 35 85.4%
2024 44 30 68.2%
2025 52 18 34.6%
2026 9 0 0.0%

332 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 493 1.6% 5.1% 72.6% 16.6%
2 223 0.9% 5.8% 73.5% 15.7%
3 77 0.0% 3.9% 84.4% 11.7%
4 30 3.3% 0.0% 90.0% 6.7%
5 15 6.7% 0.0% 93.3% 0.0%
6 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%
7 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
2.2%
2017
0.0%
2018
3.2%
2019
3.6%
2020
5.7%
2021
3.1%
2022
1.7%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.