Examiner Samuel S Outten

Grant ratio: 69.5% (39th percentile in Art Unit 2843 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.95. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 69.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.95
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90443
Primary art unit
2843
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
695
Granted applications
483
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7123
Supervisor
Andrea Lindgren Baltzell
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1988

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 52.9% 1.37
Group 232 67.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,428 61.6% 1.69
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.96 1,360 office actions across 695 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 691 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.6%
1 OA 319 45.9%
2 OAs 208 29.9%
3 OAs 90 12.9%
4 OAs 44 6.3%
5+ OAs 30 4.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 37.5% 2013 2014: 77.4% 2014 2015: 69.6% 2015 2016: 84.5% 2016 2017: 79.6% 2017 2018: 83.7% 2018 2019: 72.3% 2019 2020: 83.6% 2020 2021: 82.2% 2021 2022: 88.7% 2022 2023: 80.4% 2023 2024: 68.8% 2024 2025: 44.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20138337.5%
2014624877.4%
2015563969.6%
2016584984.5%
2017493979.6%
2018494183.7%
2019473472.3%
2020554683.6%
2021453782.2%
2022534788.7%
2023514180.4%
2024483368.8%
2025582644.8%
20265600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 691 0.3% 7.1% 86.5% 3.2%
Action 2 372 0.3% 7.0% 88.4% 3.2%
Action 3 164 0.6% 4.3% 91.5% 3.7%
Action 4 74 0.0% 5.4% 90.5% 4.1%
Action 5 30 0.0% 10.0% 83.3% 6.7%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 289 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,360 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.9%
1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 11, 2024 16/914,520 Affirmed §102 · §112
Dec. 16, 2020 15/632,760 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 14, 2020 15/355,498 Reversed §103
Dec. 30, 2019 15/008,368 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 21, 2019 14/737,851 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 10, 2018 14/102,042 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.