Examiner Dylan White

Grant ratio: 71.4% (46th percentile in Art Unit 2844 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81688
Primary art unit
2844
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
918
Granted applications
655
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1406
Supervisor
Beth Boswell
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6737

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 71.5% 1.65
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.82 1,670 office actions across 918 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 914 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.4%
1 OA 459 50.0%
2 OAs 292 31.8%
3 OAs 85 9.3%
4 OAs 39 4.2%
5+ OAs 39 4.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 90.5% 2008 2009: 81.0% 2009 2010: 95.5% 2010 2011: 85.4% 2011 2012: 85.5% 2012 2013: 83.3% 2013 2014: 90.2% 2014 2015: 81.4% 2015 2016: 88.7% 2016 2017: 82.8% 2017 2018: 82.1% 2018 2019: 54.3% 2019 2020: 34.4% 2020 2021: 52.6% 2021 2022: 60.5% 2022 2023: 61.2% 2023 2024: 61.5% 2024 2025: 27.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008423890.5%
2009584781.0%
2010444295.5%
2011484185.4%
2012554785.5%
2013605083.3%
2014615590.2%
2015594881.4%
2016625588.7%
2017584882.8%
2018564682.1%
2019351954.3%
2020321134.4%
2021191052.6%
2022382360.5%
2023493061.2%
2024523261.5%
2025481327.1%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 914 12.4% 30.1% 48.1% 2.7%
Action 2 455 29.7% 23.1% 33.6% 5.3%
Action 3 163 41.7% 22.1% 30.7% 1.2%
Action 4 78 47.4% 12.8% 30.8% 7.7%
Action 5 39 59.0% 7.7% 30.8% 2.6%
Action 6 16 81.3% 0.0% 18.8% 0.0%
Action 7 3 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 58.9% 169 of 287 office actions
All years 23.6% 394 of 1,670 office actions
Change +35.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.0%
0.0%
5.1%
0.0%
2.2%
2019: PEG
34.8%
42.7%
57.9%
62.5%
61.5%
2024: AI examples
64.2%
2025: August memo
60.9%
40.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 30, 2025 17/736,366 Reversed §101
Aug. 6, 2024 15/996,086 Affirmed §101 · §112
Aug. 31, 2023 16/043,378 Affirmed §101
Jun. 14, 2022 15/489,477 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
May. 6, 2022 15/359,380 Affirmed §101
Dec. 8, 2020 15/235,446 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.