Examiner Linh Van Nguyen

Grant ratio: 84.1% (74th percentile in Art Unit 2845 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.61. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 84.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.61
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78895
Primary art unit
2845
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,229
Granted applications
1,033
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1810
Supervisor
Mr. Dameon E. Levi
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2105

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 50 67.0% 1.67
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.65 2,027 office actions across 1,229 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,229 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 751 61.1%
2 OAs 287 23.4%
3 OAs 118 9.6%
4 OAs 43 3.5%
5+ OAs 30 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 86.8% 2008 2009: 91.3% 2009 2010: 90.2% 2010 2011: 88.2% 2011 2012: 76.9% 2012 2013: 91.2% 2013 2014: 87.5% 2014 2015: 87.8% 2015 2016: 90.0% 2016 2017: 91.5% 2017 2018: 88.8% 2018 2019: 82.6% 2019 2020: 95.4% 2020 2021: 97.2% 2021 2022: 88.6% 2022 2023: 95.5% 2023 2024: 84.0% 2024 2025: 59.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008534686.8%
2009696391.3%
2010514690.2%
2011857588.2%
2012655076.9%
2013686291.2%
2014726387.5%
2015494387.8%
2016605490.0%
2017595491.5%
2018807188.8%
2019867182.6%
2020656295.4%
2021716997.2%
2022706288.6%
2023666395.5%
2024504284.0%
2025623759.7%
20264800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,229 2.4% 19.7% 68.3% 1.7%
Action 2 478 1.0% 13.0% 77.8% 2.3%
Action 3 191 1.0% 6.8% 88.5% 1.6%
Action 4 73 1.4% 8.2% 86.3% 1.4%
Action 5 30 0.0% 13.3% 83.3% 3.3%
Action 6 13 0.0% 23.1% 76.9% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 283 office actions
All years 1.9% 38 of 2,027 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.2%
2.1%
7.1%
0.7%
1.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
3.0%
13.5%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.5%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
64.7% 11/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
88.2% 15/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 22, 2025 17/840,309 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 31, 2025 17/843,516 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
May. 9, 2025 17/459,071 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Jun. 11, 2024 16/851,848 Reversed §112
Mar. 27, 2024 17/182,339 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 8, 2023 16/740,184 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 16, 2023 16/958,505 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 14, 2022 16/543,756 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 24, 2022 15/995,071 Reversed §101 · §102 · §103
Sep. 20, 2021 16/058,749 Reversed §102
Jun. 23, 2020 15/620,770 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 27, 2020 14/800,719 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.