AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jae Kim

Appears inactive Last observed office action: September 2022 (43 months ago).

Examiner Jae Kim appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 63.8%, they average 2.07 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.07
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2008-2022)
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2840 - Electrical Circuits and Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
384
Granted Applications
245
Non-Granted Applications
139
Avg OA / Grant
2.07
Last OA Observed
September 2022 (43 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2821 , 2844 , 2845
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 63.8% 2.07
Art Unit 50 67.7% 1.67
Group 230 70.5% 1.61
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 31 12 38.7%
2009 37 17 45.9%
2010 29 18 62.1%
2011 1 1 100.0%
2012 3 0 0.0%
2013 44 23 52.3%
2014 28 19 67.9%
2015 15 10 66.7%
2016 37 19 51.4%
2017 43 33 76.7%
2018 33 22 66.7%
2019 26 24 92.3%
2020 17 15 88.2%
2021 26 23 88.5%
2022 14 9 64.3%
No observed data after 2022; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

245 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 386 0.0% 8.5% 88.9% 1.8%
2 222 0.0% 9.9% 86.5% 3.2%
3 86 0.0% 10.5% 86.0% 3.5%
4 45 0.0% 8.9% 84.4% 4.4%
5 19 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 0.0%
6 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
7 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
8 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%