Examiner Brandon Bowers

Grant ratio: 81.4% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 2851 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 81.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.52
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79266
Primary art unit
2851
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
547
Granted applications
445
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1888
Supervisor
Jack Chiang
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7483

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 75.8% 1.52
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.56 853 office actions across 547 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 544 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 364 66.5%
2 OAs 112 20.5%
3 OAs 36 6.6%
4 OAs 13 2.4%
5+ OAs 19 3.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 81.0% 2008 2009: 76.1% 2009 2010: 84.8% 2010 2011: 75.8% 2011 2012: 88.9% 2012 2013: 88.9% 2013 2014: 85.7% 2014 2015: 89.7% 2015 2016: 84.8% 2016 2017: 87.1% 2017 2018: 76.9% 2018 2019: 88.9% 2019 2020: 100.0% 2020 2021: 90.9% 2021 2022: 88.6% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 44.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008211781.0%
2009463576.1%
2010332884.8%
2011332575.8%
2012272488.9%
2013272488.9%
2014282485.7%
2015292689.7%
2016332884.8%
2017312787.1%
2018393076.9%
2019272488.9%
20202525100.0%
2021222090.9%
2022353188.6%
2023242187.5%
20242525100.0%
2025251144.0%
20261700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 544 10.3% 33.1% 44.3% 2.6%
Action 2 180 18.3% 30.0% 41.1% 1.7%
Action 3 68 20.6% 22.1% 45.6% 2.9%
Action 4 32 25.0% 21.9% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 5 19 26.3% 10.5% 57.9% 5.3%
Action 6 5 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 110 office actions
All years 13.7% 117 of 853 office actions
Change -13.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.9%
10.2%
11.8%
14.6%
9.1%
6.8%
2014: Alice
11.6%
34.7%
24.0%
43.9%
40.7%
2019: PEG
2.9%
2.7%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 9, 2020 13/395,719 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2019 14/906,543 Affirmed §101 · §112
Aug. 22, 2018 14/194,484 Affirmed §101 · §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.