Examiner Sarah Al Hashimi

Grant ratio: 78.5% (49th percentile in Art Unit 2853 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.85. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2024
Grant ratio 78.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.85
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82384
Primary art unit
2853
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
452
Granted applications
355

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 52 63.5% 1.63
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.97 894 office actions across 454 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 454 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 203 44.7%
2 OAs 157 34.6%
3 OAs 45 9.9%
4 OAs 22 4.8%
5+ OAs 27 5.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 82.7% 2008 2009: 65.4% 2009 2010: 69.8% 2010 2011: 62.5% 2011 2012: 82.7% 2012 2013: 80.7% 2013 2014: 90.0% 2014 2015: 87.2% 2015 2016: 80.0% 2016 2024: 0.0% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008524382.7%
2009523465.4%
2010433069.8%
2011483062.5%
2012524382.7%
2013574680.7%
2014807290.0%
2015474187.2%
2016201680.0%
2024100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 454 0.2% 23.3% 67.6% 0.7%
Action 2 251 0.0% 17.1% 75.7% 0.8%
Action 3 94 0.0% 11.7% 83.0% 0.0%
Action 4 49 2.0% 0.0% 95.9% 0.0%
Action 5 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 5 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 894 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 28, 2014 11/770,655 Reversed N/A
Mar. 21, 2014 11/552,523 Reversed N/A
Feb. 28, 2014 11/243,949 Reversed N/A
Dec. 31, 2013 11/589,615 Reversed N/A
Oct. 31, 2012 11/041,969 Reversed N/A
Sep. 7, 2012 11/041,991 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 27, 2012 10/990,634 Affirmed §103
Jan. 25, 2012 11/042,166 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.