Examiner Marissa Liana Ferguson Samreth

Grant ratio: 65.0% (75th percentile in Art Unit 2854 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.93. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.93
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78627
Primary art unit
2854
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
801
Granted applications
521
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2163
Supervisor
Stephen Meier
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2149

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 51.4% 2.10
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.95 1,566 office actions across 802 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 802 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 404 50.4%
2 OAs 210 26.2%
3 OAs 88 11.0%
4 OAs 46 5.7%
5+ OAs 54 6.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 54.5% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 59.0% 2011 2012: 63.0% 2012 2013: 55.3% 2013 2014: 72.7% 2014 2015: 75.0% 2015 2016: 82.1% 2016 2017: 75.6% 2017 2018: 72.9% 2018 2019: 64.7% 2019 2020: 71.6% 2020 2021: 79.5% 2021 2022: 76.2% 2022 2023: 81.0% 2023 2024: 70.0% 2024 2025: 35.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008221254.5%
2009402460.0%
2010281450.0%
2011392359.0%
2012462963.0%
2013472655.3%
2014554072.7%
2015362775.0%
2016393282.1%
2017453475.6%
2018483572.9%
2019342264.7%
2020674871.6%
2021443579.5%
2022423276.2%
2023423481.0%
2024503570.0%
2025541935.2%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 802 0.0% 9.6% 82.3% 3.7%
Action 2 398 0.0% 3.8% 90.5% 1.5%
Action 3 188 0.0% 4.3% 92.6% 1.1%
Action 4 100 0.0% 2.0% 90.0% 2.0%
Action 5 54 0.0% 1.9% 85.2% 5.6%
Action 6 17 0.0% 11.8% 88.2% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 225 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,566 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 5/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 29, 2017 12/435,853 Reversed §103
Oct. 16, 2017 13/775,704 Reversed §103
Jun. 29, 2016 11/740,642 Reversed §103
Aug. 31, 2015 11/698,068 Reversed N/A
May. 29, 2012 11/319,321 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.