Examiner David Banh

Grant ratio: 65.6% (81st percentile in Art Unit 2854 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.91. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.91
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84661
Primary art unit
2854
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
885
Granted applications
581
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3851
Supervisor
Stephen Meier
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2149

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 51.4% 2.10
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.96 1,736 office actions across 885 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 884 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 447 50.5%
2 OAs 233 26.3%
3 OAs 104 11.8%
4 OAs 52 5.9%
5+ OAs 48 5.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 56.3% 2008 2009: 47.4% 2009 2010: 35.7% 2010 2011: 38.2% 2011 2012: 25.6% 2012 2013: 59.5% 2013 2014: 64.7% 2014 2015: 78.8% 2015 2016: 78.7% 2016 2017: 83.9% 2017 2018: 88.1% 2018 2019: 88.5% 2019 2020: 68.0% 2020 2021: 83.3% 2021 2022: 85.2% 2022 2023: 84.8% 2023 2024: 84.7% 2024 2025: 44.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200816956.3%
2009381847.4%
2010421535.7%
2011341338.2%
2012391025.6%
2013845059.5%
2014342264.7%
2015332678.8%
2016614878.7%
2017564783.9%
2018423788.1%
2019524688.5%
2020503468.0%
2021544583.3%
2022544685.2%
2023463984.8%
2024595084.7%
2025582644.8%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 884 0.8% 9.0% 79.6% 5.8%
Action 2 437 1.4% 6.4% 82.8% 6.9%
Action 3 204 0.0% 3.4% 85.8% 6.9%
Action 4 100 0.0% 5.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 5 48 0.0% 8.3% 87.5% 4.2%
Action 6 28 0.0% 3.6% 89.3% 7.1%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 3 of 218 office actions
All years 0.7% 13 of 1,736 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
1.4%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.3%
2025: August memo
1.4%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 25, 2016 14/301,730 Reversed §103
Jun. 29, 2016 11/552,746 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 19, 2016 12/824,348 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 12, 2016 12/294,297 Affirmed §103
Mar. 30, 2016 11/645,027 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2014 11/709,497 Affirmed §103
Dec. 12, 2013 11/436,847 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 26, 2013 10/575,797 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.