AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Hal D. Wachsman

Appears inactive Last observed office action: July 2012 (164 months ago).

Examiner Hal D. Wachsman appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 87.2%, they average 1.60 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §101, with meaningful §101 activity and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.60
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2008-2012)
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2850 - Printing / Measuring and Testing

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
327
Granted Applications
285
Non-Granted Applications
42
Avg OA / Grant
1.60
Last OA Observed
July 2012 (164 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2857
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 87.2% 1.60
Art Unit 35 42.3% 1.89
Group 372 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 53 46 86.8%
2009 73 59 80.8%
2010 87 77 88.5%
2011 88 78 88.6%
2012 26 25 96.2%
No observed data after 2012; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

285 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 327 29.7% 25.1% 21.4% 19.0%
2 143 25.9% 14.7% 17.5% 36.4%
3 29 24.1% 13.8% 20.7% 37.9%
4 8 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 62.5%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

26.9%
2008
22.6%
2009
36.3%
2010
27.5%
2011
10.3%
2012

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.