AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jason Thomas

Potentially inactive Last observed office action: October 2025 (6 months ago).

Examiner Jason Thomas appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 46.3%, they average 3.62 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.62
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2420 - Cable and Television

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
203
Granted Applications
94
Non-Granted Applications
109
Avg OA / Grant
3.62
Last OA Observed
October 2025 (6 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2423 , 2859
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 46.3% 3.62
Art Unit 18 50.7% 2.84
Group 129 53.5% 2.61
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 12 2 16.7%
2009 17 2 11.8%
2010 18 7 38.9%
2011 16 6 37.5%
2012 22 9 40.9%
2013 46 33 71.7%
2014 14 11 78.6%
2015 14 8 57.1%
2016 18 12 66.7%
2017 6 4 66.7%
No observed data for 2018-2024.
2025 20 0 0.0%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

94 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 205 0.0% 4.9% 91.7% 2.4%
2 154 0.0% 1.3% 97.4% 1.3%
3 104 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 83 1.2% 1.2% 96.4% 0.0%
5 49 0.0% 0.0% 98.0% 2.0%
6 34 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
7 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
0.8%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.